Anticipating the Next Greenbelt Grab. By Gord Miller, Chair Earthroots

February 17, 2024
Barbara Steinhoff

Published in The Toronto Star - Opinion

Feb, 17, 2024

The battle to stop the removal of Greenbelt lands from their protected status is not over yet.

Many still protest and call for a suspension and reversal of this decision. They may yet succeed. But Bill 23 with all its restructuring of various legislation has become law and the associated “great reset” of land use planning policy is already being implemented.

Some effort should now be turned to anticipating and preventing the next move by this government to grab Greenbelt lands. And, make no mistake, there will be such a move.

The present initiative satiates the demand by big developers for land to sprawl for the next few years, but it is not enough to meet the longer-term plans of the government to continue to expand the annual housing construction in the GTAH by an order of magnitude into the next decade.

We were caught off guard by the loss of the current parcels. We still don’t know the nature and breadth of Ontario’s natural heritage that will be destroyed by this initiative. Perhaps we never will.

But we can anticipate where they will strike next. There are several signals to watch for. The first is the acquisition of large parcels of land within the existing protected Greenbelt by numbered corporations or known development companies. As we know now, this signal was activated by the recent purchase of many of the parcels that have now been sacrificed. Any such purchases should be suspect unless there is a known public function for such land assemblies.

Another signal is the design and construction of sewer and water systems in the subdivisions approved on the recently lost lands or white belt development adjacent to the Greenbelt. If these developments aren’t meant to be expanded into other protected lands, their service area should be finite and terminated. There should be no large water mains or sewers that are installed in excess of the immediate need, especially those that appear to terminate at subdivision boundaries. If these are built, the surplus capacity they create will be used to make the case for classifying adjacent protected lands.

The same logic can be applied to other serves like roads, electricity and natural gas supplies. Limiting service capacity should be a constraint that protects Greenbelt lands from delisting, not a facilitator to the process.

So, these signals have to be watched for. And this is difficult because we don’t have the institutional capacity to keep an eye on things. Municipalities would see many of these signals, but they have been compromised by the recent changes in the rules. Conservation Authorities formerly would be in positions to know what was coming but they too have been taken out of the game by Bill 23.

There needs to be an independent watchdog mechanism or this Greenbelt grab will occur again and again.

Become an Earthroots Supporter

As a non-profit organization, we rely solely on donations from supporters to keep us going. If you're able to, please consider making a donation for a better tomorrow.

Donate Now